Audacity Capital vs Blue Guardian 2026 — Full Comparison (Updated: October 2026)
Independent side-by-side analysis of challenge rules, drawdown models, profit splits, payout speeds, and trading permissions.
Audacity Capital and Blue Guardian are two distinct funded trading programmes targeting retail day traders. Audacity Capital offers a Up to 90% profit split while Blue Guardian offers 85%. Daily drawdown limits are 7.5% for Audacity Capital and 4% for Blue Guardian. Based on the PropFirmStats composite score, Blue Guardian ranks higher overall.
Audacity Capital vs Blue Guardian — Expert Analysis
When comparing Audacity Capital and Blue Guardian, several factors distinguish the two firms. Audacity Capital, founded in 2017, offers a maximum account size of $1 million, a profit split of up to 90%, and a generous drawdown structure featuring a 15% static buffer. Conversely, Blue Guardian, a newer entrant established in 2022, supports a much larger account size of up to $4 million, though it caps the profit split at 85%. Both firms allow traders to use news trading strategies and Expert Advisors (EAs), but their payout speeds differ, with Audacity providing payouts within 1-3 business days compared to Blue Guardian's 1-5 days. Moreover, Blue Guardian diversifies its trading assets, including energy and cryptocurrency, while Audacity focuses on forex, indices, metals, and gold. Traders may also appreciate the scalability options offered, which reach up to $2 million for Audacity and $4 million for Blue Guardian. Ultimately, these differences may influence a trader's decision based on their strategies and capital requirements.
Choose Audacity Capital If...
Audacity Capital is ideal for traders who value high profit splits and a flexible drawdown structure. Those who prefer a conservative risk tolerance and are focused on forex and golden trading may find Audacity's offerings appealing. Their scalping and day trading strategies can thrive under the firm’s statically defined drawdown and quick payout speed. Also, traders with a preference for a structured challenge requiring lower capital should consider Audacity’s account limits, as it allows for wider profit extraction without stringent consistency rules.
Choose Blue Guardian If...
Traders who seek a larger account size and are comfortable with a slightly lower profit split should consider Blue Guardian. It is particularly well-suited for experienced traders and those interested in trading a broader range of assets, including energy and cryptocurrencies. Blue Guardian’s higher scalability options can attract traders aiming for aggressive growth. Additionally, the firm’s weekend holding allowance may entice swing traders and those looking to capitalize on longer-term market movements, given its diverse asset offering and commitment to accommodating various trading strategies.
⚖️ PropFirmStats Verdict
For most traders, Audacity Capital wins with its higher profit split and accommodating drawdown structure, making it suitable for those focused on forex and quick trading strategies. However, Blue Guardian is the better choice for traders seeking larger account sizes and an extensive range of trading assets, especially if they engage in longer-term strategies.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Audacity Capital better than Blue Guardian?
It depends on individual trading strategies and needs. Audacity Capital excels in profit splitting and favorable drawdowns, while Blue Guardian offers larger account sizes and a wider asset range.
Which has a higher profit split, Audacity Capital or Blue Guardian?
Audacity Capital has a higher profit split of up to 90%, whereas Blue Guardian caps its split at 85%.
How do the drawdown rules compare between Audacity Capital and Blue Guardian?
Both firms allow a maximum daily loss of 5% and maximum total loss of 10%. However, Audacity Capital features a more flexible 15% static buffer.
Can I use Expert Advisors (EAs) with Audacity Capital and Blue Guardian?
Yes, both Audacity Capital and Blue Guardian allow the use of Expert Advisors (EAs) for automated trading.
Which is better for news trading — Audacity Capital or Blue Guardian?
Both firms permit news trading, so the choice depends on other factors such as profit split and asset availability.
Audacity Capital vs Blue Guardian — Verdict & Summary
Blue Guardian comes out ahead in this head-to-head based on the PropFirmStats composite rating (8.8 vs 8.9 out of 10). Both firms offer competitive profit splits — Audacity Capital at Up to 90% and Blue Guardian at 85%.
Audacity Capital — 12+ years of operation with the widest challenge drawdown available — 15% static buffer with no consistency rule.. Maximum funded account size: $2M. Daily drawdown limit: 7.5%. Typical payout speed: 1-3 business days.
Blue Guardian — 85K+ traders funded, $20M+ paid out. Up to $4M allocation, 90% split, weekend holding allowed on all accounts.. Maximum funded account size: $400K (scales to $4M). Daily drawdown limit: 4%. Typical payout speed: 24 hours (guaranteed).
Related Comparisons
Explore how Audacity Capital and Blue Guardian compare against other top-rated prop firms.